Not in its deadest nightmares had the royal family dreamed of a royal sitting in the witness box of the court. Nonetheless, here we are on the second day of Prince Harry v/s ANL. Like his late mother, Princess Diana, Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, has always been a groundbreaking force for change. This came evident when the estranged royal made no hesitation in suing UK tabloids and their rampant coverage, along with six other high-profile claimants in the Royal Courts of Justice. And the Duke seems pretty hotheaded about it. 

As reported by Yahoo News, the Prince blasted the publisher of his major-targeted UK tabloid of all time, the Daily Mail. Not only did he rob the royal family of all its secrets regarding their arrangements with these media houses to keep the fire burning, but he also affirmed a powerful message for his fellow Britishers in his witness statement. 

Prince Harry accepted that his driving force to sue the publications is obviously his personal damages. However, it was not just about him. He claimed that more than his personal problems; it is a social element as well. The Prince argued that for a publication as influential and speculative on its own, going against the legal terms can cost the country a lot. If a publication like the “Daily Mail… can successfully evade justice, then in my opinion the whole country is doomed,” he affirmed. 

The Duke of Sussex claims that the publisher poses itself as a ‘beacon of truth.’ However, it is hardly anything close to it in real life. And the outlets could keep calm no more.

Daily Mail has backfired against Prince Harry and his claims 

The Duke might be sounding pretty much against his own family. Nonetheless, it is actually for all the past scandals that they have called victims to that he is fighting against. However, the Mudorch led media also had its counter attacks ready for the Prince. The newspaper giant has straight up denied each and every claim posed at it by the six world-renowned claimants in the course. 

The defendant has stated that all the allegations made against it are “unsubstantiated and highly defamatory claims, based on no credible evidence“. The latest update about the lawsuit suggests there has not been a trial imposed on the alleged publications as of now. The outlets have thus boldly stood their ground, stating all of it was to defame their industry. 

Nonetheless, this was just day two of the battle. The two more hearings are yet to come their way. What do you think of it? Let us know in the comments below.