The royals have certainly gotten accustomed to their new life under King Charles’ reign in the United Kingdom. However, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle had quite a troublesome month across the pool in the United States. Following the stirring car chase incident along with lawsuits, defeats, and stalk encounters, the Sussexes are currently hitting the lows of the year. However, adding to the grievances was the deafening silence from Buckingham. Going by the norm, they kept a tight lip as the ghastly incident dawned on their estranged Prince. As a result, things started to worsen even more, as King Charles has straight away turned his back on Prince Harry.

As reported earlier, Prince Harry lost his legal bid for his security rearrangements subject to payment. The U.K. Home Office won with its decision for not to allow trained police officers to end up as personal bodyguards for the over-privileged. The man on a mission, who had been fighting the case alone, lost it to Justice Chamberlain last a couple of days ago. Navigating through the same, royal expert Ian Pelham Turner has claimed how the Prince being left alone was inevitable. 

King Charles will not be able to help Prince Harry 

Royal commentator Shannon Felton Spencer brought it to Fox News Digital’s notice. The British Government’s denial to support the Prince will strain his relationship with father King Charles even more. That is because the royal family usually keeps away from “washing dirty laundry” going against the interest of the Institution. Moreover, King Charles does not officially have any power to alter the course of court rulings. Nor does he have any power to reverse control over the Home Office which comes under the British Government.  

“They know that the king is very unlikely to lift a finger for them at this point,” said Kinsley Schofield in another stirring episode as reported by Fox. Schofield further continued how the King does have a soft spot for Prince Harry. However, he would not be able to help his youngest out of the problem. However, some other experts have a different perspective.

One expert is of the view that the rules should be re-scrutinized 

Ian Pelham Turner personally feels that the same was an “inexplicable decision.” Although the payment to the metropolitan police through the taxpayer was a bit unusual, the Duke and Duchess being deprived of paying for their own protection was a major blow to the couple. He thus promotes the idea of the Monarchy being open to new financing methods for the members of the royal family. 

“We now live in 2023, not 1923,” claimed the expert to Fox. The expert also believes that this method of the Sussexes looking after their own expenses in times of financial crisis in the United Kingdom could have been “a massive step forward.” 

What is your take on the matter?